Blog Post

Piercing the LLC Veil in Illinois

Michael Brennan • Feb 02, 2018

The analysis may not be what everyone thought.

I often receive questions from small business owners or folks thinking about starting a new business about how best to protect themselves from liability. Not surprisingly, from a legal standpoint, it’s usually the primary concern of new business owners. In the age of Google, it’s possible for curious entrepreneurs to look into that question on their own before coming to me for my opinion. No doubt your trusty search engine is a wonderful source of information, but as the saying goes, “don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”

Eventually, those inquiring minds come across the term, “piercing the corporate veil.” The term refers to a court’s ability to disregard a corporate entity in order to reach the individuals behind that company in order to impose liability on them personally for acts of the company. This can be done for a number of reasons, but the most likely is that the corporation does not have sufficient assets to settle a debt or judgment against it.

So, what’s scary for business owners is that, even if they create an entity specifically meant to separate their business affairs and liability from their own, they still could be liable for the business’s actions.

The concept of piercing the corporate veil has a long and relatively developed history for various reasons beyond the scope of this post. But, everything from the history behind the creation of the corporation concept in American law to the wording of state statutes relating to their creation and a long line of court decisions dealing with a wide range of factual scenarios has provided a substantial base from which courts are able to apply long-developed concepts and principals.

So, how is a business owner supposed to best protect herself from the risk that she may be held liable for the actions of her business? Well, the answer really depends. That’s because the laws around piercing have been developed, at least in Illinois, as the concept specifically relates to corporations.

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Illinois

Generally, a court in Illinois will apply a two-pronged test to determine whether a business owner should be liable for actions of the company. The test is whether:

1) there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the parties who compose it no longer exist, and

2) circumstances are such that adherence to the fiction of a separate corporation would promote injustice.*

In determining whether those prongs are met, Illinois courts may consider a number of factors like:

· Whether the corporation was adequately capitalized (had sufficient assets in relation to its debts and operations);

· Whether it issued stock;

· Whether it followed corporate formalities, like holding meetings, keeping minutes, keeping accurate books and records, providing required notices, etc.;

· Failing to pay dividends or make other distributions;

· Comingling of business and personal assets;

· Generally, whether the corporation is merely a façade for personal operations.

Given the lengthy history of piercing the corporate veil of Illinois corporations, it’s no wonder that new business owners would have questions about whether they are opening themselves up to unnecessary liability simply by starting a business.

But, while it may seem like a high-risk proposition, in general, an owner who treats his business as legitimate will typically not have an issue. Though, it is still important to be aware of the risks and ways to alleviate them.

For the business owner or entrepreneur that may really be worried about the issue, there may be an even safer way to structure the company. That is by creating an Illinois Limited Liability Company.

Piercing the LLC Veil in Illinois

Admittedly, as a practitioner, I generally tended to view the issue of piercing an LLC veil in the same light as piercing the veil of a corporation until very recently.

In the July 2015 issue of the Illinois Bar Journal, Sandra Mertins , of the Chicago firm of Dale & Gensburg, P.C. laid out a convincing case that courts may not have the same ability or willingness to pierce an LLC veil as they commonly have when their actions relate to corporations. Ms. Mertins explains that the language of the Illinois Limited Liability Company Act may specifically prohibit courts from piercing the LLC entity to reach its members and managers. Specifically, 805 ILCS 180/10-10 provides:

“(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this Section, the debts, obligations, and liabilities of a limited liability company , whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise, are solely the debts, obligations, and liabilities of the company . A member or manager is not personally liable for a debt, obligation, or liability of the company solely by reason of being or acting as a member or manager….

… (d) All or specified members of a limited liability company are liable in their capacity as members for all or specified debts, obligations, or liabilities of the company if:

(1) a provision to that effect is contained in the articles of organization; and

(2) a member so liable has consented in writing to the adoption of the provision or to be bound by the provision. ( emphasis added ).

As the statute states, members and managers are not liable for company debts or obligations unless either 1) the articles organizing the company specifically make them liable, or 2) they consent in writing to liability.

Ms. Mertins notes that since the adoption of that section in 1998, Illinois courts have struggled with piercing LLC veils, as the statute seemingly expressly prohibits it. The majority of Illinois cases dealing specifically with the issue have come to that conclusion while citing the above section. While there have been a handful of cases that have reached a different conclusion, they have not specifically been on point to solely dealing with the Illinois statute at its core (for example, as Mertins notes, Westmeyer v. Flynn, where the court found piercing permissible dealt with an Illinois LLC but the Delaware LLC Act, which does not expressly prohibit piercing, while in On Command Video Corp. v. Roti , the court indicated that piercing may be permissible, but it is noteworthy that neither party argued it would be impermissible.)

So, the takeaway for business owners worried about potential piercing is that LLC’s may provide a level of protection that corporations may not necessarily provide, at least in Illinois. Of course, LLCs have only been around in the state for less than twenty-five years so they don’t enjoy the long history of legal analysis and development that corporations do. Given that, it remains to be seen how courts may develop the concept of piercing as it relates to Illinois LLCs, but at least for the time being, they seem like a relatively safe option for the new business owner worried about personal liability.

* Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc., 362 Ill App. 3d 491, 500 (2d Dist. 2005).

Michael F. Brennan is an attorney at the Virtual Attorney™ a virtual law office helping clients in Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota with estate planning and small business legal needs. He can be reached at michael.brennan@mfblegal.com with questions or comments, or check out his website at www.thevirtualattorney.com .

The information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. For specific legal advice regarding a specific legal issue please contact me or another attorney for assistance.

By Michael Brennan 21 Sep, 2022
It’s a fairly common situation to find yourself in as a small business owner—for one of a wide range of reasons you’ve decided it’s time to being a new partner into your business in some capacity.
By Michael Brennan 23 Aug, 2022
Have you thought about your beneficiaries under your estate plan? There may be more to it than meets the eye.
By Michael Brennan 02 Sep, 2021
A power of attorney for health care enables an individual to appoint a trusted agent to make medical decisions on his or her behalf if the individual is unable or unwilling to do so for themselves. For example, if a situation arises where you are in an accident and need emergency medical care, doctors will look to a trusted individual to make decisions on your behalf. Typically, this is family members, and technically, most state laws set an order of precedence on who doctors should turn to in the absence of any specific (and legally binding) instructions from the patient. However, the most ideal situation is one in which doctors rely on the instructions the patient has detailed in a valid power of attorney. Powers of attorney for health care do not have many specific requirements for validity. But, they do need to be signed by the patient and at least one witness (this varies by state). Often, someone may decide that they need a health care power of attorney in a pinch. For example, an older parent may be going in for surgery and want to cover their bases if something goes wrong. They may decide the day of the surgery that they would like to name an adult child as their health care decision-maker if something happens, so that child cannot serve as the witness. Typically, an estate planning attorney could witness the document, but that may mean scrambling at the last minute for an appointment or coordinating a meeting quickly on the way to the hospital. Not ideal. Now, however, Illinois has amended the Illinois Power of Attorney Act to permit electronic signatures. The Act states that: “The signature and execution requirements set forth in this Article are satisfied by: (i) written signatures or initials; or (ii) electronic signatures or computer-generated signature codes .” The Illinois Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act permits those witnesses not only to sign electronically, but also to sign remotely. So, instead of a mad last-minute scramble to sign and witness an 11th hour power of attorney, one can be e-signed online through video conferencing with the principal and estate planning attorney quickly linking up on zoom from the comfort of their home, office, or even the hospital bed, with much more simplicity and convenience. The Power of Attorney Act was further amended to permit powers of attorney for health care to be in electronic format. So, it is no longer a requirement to dig the paper hard copy out of the basement filing cabinet and remember to bring it to the hospital. Instead, an electronic copy can simply be sent to the hospital through its patient portal, once that functionality is set up by the health care provider at least. The power of attorney can now easily form a seamless part of a health care record, neatly kept in an electronic medical file. The pandemic of 2020-2021 forced institutions to make things more efficient and reflective of the technologically-centric world we now live in. That is not more evident in many places as it is the area of law. And, few practicing attorneys would tell you that’s a bad thing.
By Michael Brennan 05 Aug, 2021
On June 26, 2021, Illinois adopted the Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act. Plainly, the Act is a generational game changer for estate planning. Gone are the days of scheduling a formal office appointment with your attorney to sign estate planning documents as the law office staff witnesses and notarizes those documents on the spot.
By Michael Brennan 30 Jul, 2021
Preparing a last will and testament has always required the inclusion of original signatures of both the person making the will and witnesses. Understandably, coordinating the signing of the will could pose some administrative challenges, especially for small law firms and solo practitioners—not to mention the many people who elect to draft a will without an attorney’s help—who may not have a crowded office full of willing witnesses. Along with wills, estate plans typically include powers of attorney for finances and health care decision making as well. Those documents also require original signatures from their creators, witnesses, and notaries. Predictably, COVID-19 and the resulting government shutdowns of businesses and encouragement of social distancing and remote work complicated the task of signing and witnessing these important estate documents (Notaries are also now permitted to act remotely under a separate but related piece of legislation). Luckily, in many states, temporary orders permitted the remote execution of many documents, and a framework for conducting remote document signings began to take form. On June 26, 2021, Illinois adopted the Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act. Plainly, the Act is a generational game changer for estate planning. Gone are the days of scheduling a formal office appointment with your attorney to sign estate planning documents as the law office staff witnesses and notarizes those documents on the spot. Now, under the EWRWA, the need for the conference table signing is gone. Wills, powers or attorney, and other important estate documents can be validly signed and witnessed remotely through audio-video communications. More so, “electronic wills”—those not physically printed on paper—are now an acceptable form of will in Illinois that can be probated just as paper wills have for decades. Some of the highlights of the new law are below. Electronic Copies of wills are now valid. Electronic Wills are now an option. The new law defines an electronic will as simply “a will that is created and maintained as a tamper-evident electronic record.” What is “tamper-evident” exactly? Well, the statute defines it as a “feature of an electronic record by which any change to the electronic record is displayed.” So, popular document signature software like Docusign and Hellosign would do the trick. Individuals and Witnesses can now sign on multiple signature pages with one master document being compiled later on. If a platform like Docusign is not used to create and sign an electronic will, there is now an option to use multiple signature pages for the testator and witnesses. In practice, this enables a testator to sign a will while the witnesses watch over audio-video means, like Zoom. They can then each sign the signature page sitting with them at their physical location. The testator and witnesses can then send the originals to a central location (likely the estate planning attorney) to be compiled into one master document. Previously, this was impermissible, as the document would have had to have been signed in the conscious presence of each other. The Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act redefines “presence” to expressly include, “being in a different physical location from another person, but able, using audio-video communication, to know the person is signing a document in real time.” Witnesses can witness signings (and sign) remotely through video-conferencing. As mentioned, witnesses to a will previously had to be physically present with the testator. Under the new law, witnesses can now be remote. If an electronic will is prepared for signatures, the witnesses can simply sign the electronic will after watching the testator sign. If a paper copy is being used, then the witnesses can watch the testator sign his or her own paper copy, and then sign a separate signature page in their remote location. For paper copies, the witnesses and testator must physically compile all the signature pages within 10 days. The person appointed by the testator to compile all the signature pages must state that the signature pages were attached within 10 business days of signing and that the pages were attached to the testator’s complete and correct will for the will t be admitted to probate. So, best practice is to attach those statements to the will at the time of its signing or the time at which the master document is compiled. Wills can be signed electronically. Electronic signatures have previously not been permissible forms of signing a will. Now, however, the new Act changes everything. Testators and witnesses alike can not e-sign wills. To do so validly, the will must designate Illinois as the state of its execution, be signed by the testator or by some person at the testator’s direction and in their presence, and be attested to in the presence of the testator by two or more credible witnesses who are located in the United States at the time of execution. The change of the “presence” requirement is revolutionary, as “presence” now includes being in a different physical location from another person, but able to know the person is signing a document in real time using audio-video communication. Additional Documents, like Powers of Attorney can now be signed virtually Wills are not the only estate planning documents that require witness signatures. Powers of attorney and living wills are just as essential to creating a comprehensive estate plan. Illinois’ Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act also authorizes the witnessing of any document other than a will using audio-video communication. The signatures of the principal and witnesses may be on the same or different pages provided the master document is compiled within 10 business days. While COVID-19 forced the legal industry to adjust, it appears that some of those adjustments were just what was needed to bring estate planning into the 21st century.
By Michael Brennan 15 Jun, 2020
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (the SECURE Act) took effect at the beginning of 2020 and has brought some significant changes to how retirement accounts may need to be planned for.
By Michael Brennan 01 Jun, 2020
Here are five things that business owners should be doing now to alleviate the effects of COVID-19
By Michael Brennan 23 Apr, 2020
Executing estate plan documents during the stay-at-home order can be a challenge. But there are still options to get things done now.
By Michael Brennan 16 Apr, 2020
It's something every parent thinks about--who will take care of my kids if I'm gone? It's a huge decision, but it may not be as tough a choice as you think.
More Posts
Share by: